Skip to main content

Advertisement

Are patient-centered care values as reflected in teaching scenarios really being taught when implemented by teaching faculty? A discourse analysis on an Indonesian medical school's curriculum

Abstract

Background

According to The Indonesian Medical Council, 2006, Indonesian competence-based medical curriculum should be oriented towards family medicine. We aimed to find out if the educational goal of patient-centered care within family medicine (comprehensive care and continuous care) were adequately transferred from the expected curriculum to implemented curriculum and teaching process.

Methods

Discourse analysis was done by 3 general practitioners of scenarios and learning objectives of an Indonesian undergraduate medical curriculum. The coders categorized those sentences into two groups: met or unmet the educational goal of patient-centered care.

Results

Text analysis showed gaps in patient-centered care training between the scenarios and the learning objectives which were developed by both curriculum committee and the block planning groups and the way in which the material was taught. Most sentences in the scenarios were more relevant to patient-centered care while most sentences in the learning objectives were more inclined towards disease-perspectives.

Conclusions

There is currently a discrepancy between expected patient-centered care values in the scenario and instructional materials that are being used.

Background

The "Health for All" goals as stated in the 1978 Alma Ata declaration described the need to acknowledge the patient as a person [1]. It is essential that patient-centered care be recognized by health professionals who work in any domain of medicine. Patient-centered care is at the core of care provided by family practitioners [27]. Caring for patients, while recognizing their personal and environmental background helps to define the specialty of family practice. This is in contrast to other specialties that often view patients based on particular specific diseases.

In 2006, the Indonesian Medical Council, adopted a competence-based education as the basis for undergraduate medical curriculum and clearly stated the orientation of the curriculum should be towards family medicine [810]. The idea was that all undergraduates would learn 7 competencies: effective communication, clinical skills, medical knowledge, patient-management, information-management, life-long learning and ethics-professionalism [8]. Looking at general scope of the 7 competences, patient-centered care values should have already been included.

There is often a discrepancy between "curriculum on paper" and "curriculum in action" [11]. One study from the Netherlands found that medical students in their last year of school viewed disease oriented learning more favorably than behavioral and social sciences [12]. One study from Australia found that there was a conflict between desired learning outcomes towards elderly health problems; instead of training in chronic diseases, the actual scenarios of tutorials mostly leaned towards more acute illnesses [13]. A lesson learned from a European medical school, which used a problem based learning curriculum since its establishment in 1974, showed that a consistent and persistent focus of the final objectives of the curriculum towards family medicine was important but easier said than done; there is a creep towards disease oriented training [14]. Other studies using exploratory approaches uncover the hidden agenda within a curriculum which were more teacher-centered, examination driven, and required passive learning on the part of the student [15, 16]. A more disease oriented training persists within the medical curriculums in both Western and non-Western medical schools.

Inspired by those lessons, we have chosen to find out if the scenarios and learning objectives in an Indonesian medical school's curriculum that oriented towards family medicine practice were adequately sensitizing students to the values of patient-centered care. We used a qualitative approach by applying a discourse analysis method to explore any discrepancy between problem formulation in the scenarios (presented to the students) and its learning objectives (hidden and driven by tutors) towards a patient-centered care tutorial discussion.

The context of this study

The New Issue of Family Medicine in Indonesia

In most of the world, education in family practice is taken at the post graduate level [17]. Family practice specialization in the Asian region takes 1 to 3 years of formal, structured postgraduate education program for general practice or family practice specialization. The exceptions are Indonesia and few other countries [2].

The current national health care and health education system in Indonesia requires six years of undergraduate medical education before becoming a physician. Planning included an additional year of internship. However, clinical education in Indonesia was department-based and there are no recognized departments of family medicine or general practice in any of the medical schools in Indonesia. It is a classic "chicken and egg dilemma": we want training programs in family medicine but there are no specialists in family medicine to teach our undergraduates and graduates. Thus, teachers for the internship program may come from general practitioners who do not possess adequate formal postgraduate education on family medicine or may come from hospital-based specialties that do not reflect the realities of health problems in the community. There are gaps in time-spent, knowledge, skillfulness and professionalism between GPs and other specialists in Indonesia.

Approximately two thirds of the doctors in Indonesia are primary care doctors. Considering the essential roles of primary care doctors in this country and the lack of postgraduate clinical training, the World Health Organization (WHO) made a recommendation in 2003 that Indonesian primary care doctors should undertake additional postgraduate education as family doctors [2]. However, the representative board of Indonesian Medical Council decided not to go along with this recommendation. Rather, they decided to improve the training in "Family Medicine" at the undergraduate level.

The development of a competence-based curriculum that oriented towards family medicine using a problem based learning approach in an Indonesian school of medicine

In this study, we examined an Indonesian competence-based medical curriculum. The curriculum oriented towards family medicine practice and uses a problem based learning approach to stimulate self directed learning in which adapted from a Western medical curriculum [14]. We chose to examine a curriculum of a medical school which has the longest tradition of medical education innovation in this country. This medical school has been using a problem based learning strategy since early eighties and has led the curriculum development of many other health education institutions in Indonesia. In this medical school, the 7 areas of competences are in theory adapted into many learning strategy such as tutorial discussions, skills training, laboratory practice and field work [18].

A macro view of the curriculum shows a design around general learning objectives (based on the 7 competencies from Indonesian Medical Council, 2006) for each academic year. The themes for year 1, 2 and 3 are: The Human Body System, The Life Cycle and The Multisystem or Chronic Illnesses consecutively. Each academic year theme consists of 6 blocks. Afterwards, an assessment committee guided the general guidelines of the block assessment process.

At the micro level of the curriculum, the multidisciplinary block planning group designed each block, starting from re-considering the learning objectives, creating the scenarios for discussion, defining the facilitators (tutors, lectures, and instructors), organizing the schedule and finally creating scenarios for the assessment as guided by the assessment committee. Each blocks containing 6 scenarios. One scenario may consist of 5-10 learning objectives known to the tutors but not to the students.

Methods

We analyzed the discourse in the scenarios and the learning objectives of year 1, 2 and 3. We did not include year 4, year 5 and year 6 because they were under construction during the study period. A discourse analysis is chosen to provide rich analysis on the event and meaning beyond the analyzed-texts [1921].

Subjects

Three coders were general practitioners from a family medicine team at an Indonesian school of medicine. The coders work in a routine primary care service and are involved in the teaching of primary care for undergraduate medical students for more than 10 years. As one of coders, the first author underwent a distance socio-cultural learning theories course (included discourse analysis course) for 9 months provided by the School of Health Professional Education, Maastricht University, The Netherlands, 2010-2011. Other coders were trained in discourse-analysis methods by the first author for a total of 16 hours using international guidelines [1921]. We analyzed scenarios and its learning objectives of a total 108 scenarios and 1080 learning objectives of the 18 blocks in year 1, 2 and 3.

Instruments

We used two principles representing the patient-centered care which are fundamental for primary care practices: 1. The Comprehensive Care based on the Bio-psycho-social-economic-education-environment-culture and spiritual concern towards patients and 2. The Continuous Care based on adequate understanding of five levels of prevention and the natural history of diseases [47]. We defined two categories in the coding process: met or unmet the educational goal of patient-centered care. We defined it "met educational goal of patient-centered care" if the sentence stimulated students to think beyond the disease, more about the patient with his/her illness and perspective, the environment and also continuity of care. The three coders met three times 2 hours to agree on certain criteria considering comprehensive care and continuous care, before starting the coding process. The agreement on general criteria was presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Agreement among three coders of met and unmet educational goals of patient-centered care criteria

Procedures

Each coder defined each sentence in each scenario and learning objectives of each block, based on the two categories. Three coders met when they finished 6 scenarios in 1 block to discuss their findings of the two categories until they reached agreement. Total coding process took 20 weeks (April-August 2010). The coding process took place in Bahasa Indonesia. The first author translated the result into English for presentation and manuscript writing purposes, after agreement of other coders.

Analysis

The text in scenarios and learning objectives was analyzed based on discourse analysis methods [1921].

Results

Results are noted in Table 2. All three coders agreed that 527 sentences among 650 sentences in the 108 scenarios met the educational goal of patient-centered care. There were 1080 sentences in the actual teaching material. Of these, only 104 of the sentences met the educational goal of patient-centered care. Table 3 described examples of discourse-analysis findings of the scenarios and the learning objectives of an Indonesian medical school's curriculum. We found a discrepancy between written scenarios, which mostly addressed patient-centered care principles (the comprehensive and continuous cares) and the implemented learning objectives in which leaned towards specific diseases or medical content.

Table 2 Agreement among three coders of number of scenarios and learning objectives analyzed by discourse analysis method
Table 3 Description of discourse-analysis findings of three scenarios and its learning objectives from three academic years of an Indonesian medical school's curriculum

Examples of sentences in the scenarios that met the educational goal of patient-centered care values:

"She plans to get married next month but she would not like to get pregnant until she finishes her study in the Faculty of Law." (Sentence-3, Scenario-4, Block 2.2 Safe Motherhood and Neonates)

"His doctor has an appropriate recommendation for his work and family counseling after recovery". (Sentence-9, Scenario-3, Block 2.5 Adulthood)

"These sentences stimulate students to think beyond patient's health problems. The patient-centered care values were adequately expressed in the concern of comprehensive care and the continuous care towards the patient as individual, as family member and as a member of his/her society".

(Agreement among three coders)

Examples of sentences in the scenario that unmet the educational goal of patient-centered care values:

"Please think a lot about the mechanism of the problem above". (Sentence-5, Scenario-2, Block 1.3 Digestive System)

"The doctor sent her to the laboratory for a skin-scrapping and a direct skin examination test by KOH 30% stain and culture in order to find out the causative agent". (Sentence-6, Scenario-7, Block 2.5 Adulthood)

"These sentences may drive students to think on the pathophysiology and procedures, in which of course fundamental for basic medical sciences; however less attention may be given to the patient as a person. The first sentence was the last sentence in the particular scenario that confronted all patient-centered messages in previous sentences. The second sentence mentioned the word 'sent' without careful acknowledgement on patient's consent". Carefully obtaining patients' consent is fundamental in comprehensive care as well as continuous care principles. Obtaining patients' consent may become one of learning objectives in this scenario, so that students may not only pay attention on the disease (diagnosis and treatment) but also paying attention on patient's concern.

(Agreement among three coders)

Examples of sentences in the learning objectives that met the educational goal of patient-centered care values:

"Aware of the professional value as a medical doctor."

(Learning Objective-5, Block 1.1 Locomotors System)

"Conduct physical examination in a holistic manner according to patient's problem".

(Learning Objective-3, Block 3.4 Limited Movement)

"These sentences stimulate students to think beyond patient's health problems. The patient-centered care values were adequately expressed the personal care in the behavioral-socioemotional ethical concern towards patient as a person".

(Agreement among three coders)

Examples of sentences in the learning objectives that unmet the educational goal of patient-centered care values:

"Explain etiology and classification of heart failure-New York Heart Association".

(Learning Objective-3, Block 3.2 Chest Complaints 2009)

"Explain the definition of diarrhea".

(Learning Objective-1, Block 1.3 Digestive System 2009)

"These were common sentences we found during analyzing the learning objectives across all blocks in the year 1,2,3 undergraduate curriculum. Most of patient-centered care messages in the scenarios might be neglected when students or tutors found out these learning objectives. We understand that the basic medical sciences need these learning objectives. However, we think that most of learning objectives we analyzed were focusing only on area 2 of competency that was 'medical knowledge' and abandon the other 6 areas of competencies of medical doctors in Indonesia that we understand from the Indonesian Medical Council, 2006".

(Agreement among three coders)

Discussion

This study found gaps in expected patient-centered care values (presented in the scenario) and mostly disease-oriented actual learning objectives (presented in tutors' book). We have assumed that patient-centered care principles must have included in the 7 general areas of competences because the curriculum was oriented towards family medicine. The spirit of patient-centered care may have been missing along the way of the development of the curriculum and educational goals in the particular medical school. However, the way block planning groups creatively translated the disease-oriented learning objectives into more patient-centered scenarios were remarkable and included the effort of hospital specialists' who were trying to be aware of the importance of patient-centered care ideals. Clinical teachers created a more patient-centered scenario in purpose to attract students' attention to learn contextual cases. Three decades experience of problem based learning approaches of the medical school reflected in this endeavor of teaching patient-centered care values.

Nevertheless, there are threats to misuse the patient-centered care scenarios. First, the meaning of "contextual" clinical case. Teachers are mostly working at a teaching hospital. Lots of scenarios in later years are referring to a patient who came to the hospital. If the patient mentioned in the scenario presented in a primary health care settings, the disease description remains the same. It is not our goal to limit clinical knowledge but rather to put it into a context in which the patient is seen as more than the disease. Additionally, many presentations in primary care remain undifferentiated. It is important to teach clinical problem solving to students in order to better deal with this uncertainty [22]. In this respect, achievement of comprehensive and continuous care values is questioned.

Second, "contextual" scenarios are threatened by the current learning objectives. Students did not know the learning objectives when they read a scenario during a tutorial discussion. Therefore, most of tutorial discussions may begin with curiosity on "who the patient is" and "what was going on the context of clinical cases" as expected by the block planning groups. However, the curiosity on patients' background and concern may not last long. In the end of the discussion students will likely to formulate learning goals that are leaned towards diseases than illnesses as guided by tutors who have been guided by the learning objectives. Teachers in earlier year are mostly come from pre-clinical departments and are general practitioners. However, more than half of scenarios in the first year are leaned towards basic medical sciences of anatomy, physiology and biochemistry than to understand a family as a unit of care. Therefore, in three years of basic medical education, general primary care principles are likely insufficiently covered. Our observations on several actual learning outcomes of tutorial discussion formulated by students of academic year 3 showed limited attention to patient-centered care values. Most of actual learning outcome emphasized diagnosis and treatment establishment, without touching doctor - patient and their family - interaction. However, this observation was limited in number to be included in this study.

Another study in the area of effective communication showed that doctors in a teaching hospital rarely respond to patients' concern but mostly did brief diagnosis establishment and prompt treatment [23]. Further study on our community based program showed that students had difficulties in working with health workers and lay people in the area of interpersonal skills and inter-professional skills [24]. Thus, the current undergraduate orientation towards family medicine is ineffective.

We assumed that if we included year 4 tutorial discussions that will be no significance change to our findings. This raises the concern of unmet educational goal of patient-centered care in later years of study. Moreover, year 5 and 6 are clinical rotation stages which are department based (without a family medicine department). A medical doctor trained in this context of the study may have difficulty framing the problem of one of the patient's concern rather than a simple disease to be cured. Therefore, a clear distinction between studying basic medical sciences, studying general clinical medicine, and studying hospital-based clinical sciences is needed in the context of this study [25, 26].

One of limitations in this study is that we analyzed a curriculum of only one medical school in Indonesia. However to our knowledge, this medical school leads many medical institutions in curriculum reformation. Another limitation was that only one method of discourse analysis performed. A more multifactorial methodology may leads to improved comprehension of the curriculum and prospectus modification [27]. The other limitation was that all GPs as coders in this study were not trained in a formal general practice specialization program, due to the fact that there is not such a program in Indonesia. The comprehension of the patient-centered principles could therefore be superficial. Studies in students' actual learning outcomes and students' assessment concerning patient-centered care values are essential following this study.

The current health problems in Indonesia are TB-HIV, high Maternal Mortality Rate and Infant Mortality Rate, Malaria, Dengue Fever, Malnutrition and Chronic illness such as Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus [28]. Basic sciences should also view such cases from a general primary care medicine point of view which is different from hospital-based clinical perspectives. More community based educational approaches may help to sensitize medical students to be aware of different types of health problems in family, community and hospitals. Community based educational strategy had been proven to help students and teachers to understand the comprehensive care and continuous care principles [29]. By learning at the community settings, students are likely to perform direct observations of health care access, listening and responding to persons' concern, assisting people through various levels of preventions, seeing clinical cases from variation of clinical stages, working with people from different background and many more benefits help them sensitive with patient-centered care values.

Conclusion

The current basic medical education curriculum in Indonesia that is supposed to be oriented towards family medicine has not succeeded. We recommended appropriate patient-centered care training for medical students to be more sensitive to patients' problem. Proper undergraduate and postgraduate training on primary care practice with community based educational approaches are required.

Ethical approval

This study was part of an Evaluation Study of the Curriculum Development of Faculty of Medicine Gadjah Mada University under the NPT-Project, 2010. The ethical approval was obtained from the Committee Ethics UGM under the Evaluation Study of the Curriculum Development FM UGM 2010.

References

  1. 1.

    WHO: International Conference on Primary Health Care 6–12 September. Alma Ata: World Health Organization; 1978.

  2. 2.

    WHO: Family Medicine Report of a Regional Scientific Work Group Meeting on Core Curriculum. Srilanka: World Health Organization; 2003.

  3. 3.

    WHA-World Health Assembly 62.12: Primary Health Care including Health System Strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.

  4. 4.

    Gan GL, Azwar A, Wonodirekso S: A Primer on Family Medicine Practice. Singapore International Foundation; 2004.

  5. 5.

    Graber MA, Wilbur JK: Family Practice Examination and Board Review. McGraw-Hill; 2009.

  6. 6.

    McWhinney IR: A Textbook of Family Medicine. Oxford University Press; 1997.

  7. 7.

    Paulman PM, Paulman AA, Harrison JD: Taylor's Manual of Family Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

  8. 8.

    Indonesian Medical Council: The National Standards Competencies of Indonesian Medical Doctors. Jakarta: Indonesian Medical Council; 2006.

  9. 9.

    Ministry of National Education: The Indonesian National Education System. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education; 2003.

  10. 10.

    Carracio C, Susan D, Wolfsthal , Englander R, Ferentz K, Martin C: Shifting paradigms: From Flexner to Competencies. Academic Medicine 2002, 77: 361–367. 10.1097/00001888-200205000-00003

  11. 11.

    Mann K, Dornan T, Teunissen P: Curriculum Perspective in Learning. Elsevier Ltd; 2011.

  12. 12.

    Verhoeven BV, Verwijnen GM, Scherpbier AJJA, van der Vleuten CPM: Growth of medical knowledge. Medical Education 2002, 36: 711–717. 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01268.x

  13. 13.

    Finucane P, Nair B: Is there a problem with the problems in problem-based learning? Medical Education 2002, 36: 279–281. 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01150.x

  14. 14.

    Verheggen M, Snellen-Balendong H: Designing a problem based learning curriculum. Lessons from Problem Based Learning. Edited by: van Berkel H, Scherpbier A, Hillen H and van der Vleuten C. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.

  15. 15.

    Murakami M, Kawabata H, Maezawa M: The perception of the hidden curriculum on medical education: an exploratory study. Asia Pacific Family Medicine 2009, 8: 9. 10.1186/1447-056X-8-9

  16. 16.

    Lempp H, Scale C: The hidden curriculum in undergraduate medical education: qualitative study of medical students' perception of teaching. BMJ 2004,329(7469):770–3. 10.1136/bmj.329.7469.770

  17. 17.

    Dornan T: Experience Based Learning: Learning clinical medicine in workplace. Maastricht: UM Press; 2006.

  18. 18.

    Prihatiningsih TS, Emilia O, Rahayu GR: The Gadjah Mada Medical Curriculum. In Faculty of Medicine. Yogyakarta: UGM Press; 2009.

  19. 19.

    Fairclough N: Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge; 2003.

  20. 20.

    Gee JP: An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge Pub; 1999.

  21. 21.

    Blommaert J: Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

  22. 22.

    Green LA, Fryer GE, Yawn BP, Lanier D, Dovey SM: The Ecology of Medical Care Revisited. N Engl J Med 2001,344(26):2021–2025. 10.1056/NEJM200106283442611

  23. 23.

    Claramita M, Van Dalen J, Van der Vleuten CPM: South East Asian doctors and patients are not approaching their perceived ideal partnership style of consultation. Patient Education and Counseling 2011,PII: S0738–3991(11):00112–1. 10.1016/j. pec.2011.02.002

  24. 24.

    Wibowo F, Claramita M, Prabandari YS: Effect to the community: a community based approach of medical students communication skills training. Yogyakarta: UGM Press; 2011.

  25. 25.

    Snell LM, Battles JB, Bedford JA, Washington ET: Verifying the Curriculum of Family Medicine Clerkship. Medical Education 1998, 32: 370375.

  26. 26.

    Osborn EH, Lancaster C, Bellack PJ, O'Neil E, Graber DR: Differences in Curriculum Emphasis in US Undergraduate and Generalist Residency Education Programmes. Medical Education 1999, 33: 921–925. 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00409.x

  27. 27.

    Watchler C, Troein M: A Hidden Curriculum: Mapping Cultural Competency in a Medical Programme. Medical Education 2003, 37: 861–868. 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01624.x

  28. 28.

    Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia: Profile of Indonesian Health States. Jakarta: Ministry of Health; 2008.

  29. 29.

    Strumberg JP, Reid S, Khadra MH: A Longitudinal Patient-Centered Integrated Curriculum: Facilitating Community Based Education in a Rural Clinical School. Education for Health 2002,15(3):294–304. 10.1080/1357628021000012787

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thankful the Curriculum Committee of Faculty of Medicine Gadjah Mada University for the wisdom and willingness to listen, Professor Job Metsemakers from Maastricht University for inspiring this work, doctor Manik Kharismayekti for her commitment towards primary care practice and the NPT Project UGM-UM for a great and continuous support.

Author information

Correspondence to Mora Claramita.

Additional information

Competing interests

Non-financial competing interest: The authors declare an academic competing interest of teaching family medicine with patient-centered care approaches for both undergraduate and postgraduate medical education.

Authors' contributions

MC designed this study and wrote the first draft of this paper. MC and ADS were two of the three coders. MAG provided advices on the content of patient-centered care in family medicine. AS contributed advices on the content of curriculum-discrepancy and guided the process of scientific writing. All four authors discussed and revised the first draft until the final version to be submitted.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Claramita, M., Sutomo, A.H., Graber, M.A. et al. Are patient-centered care values as reflected in teaching scenarios really being taught when implemented by teaching faculty? A discourse analysis on an Indonesian medical school's curriculum. Asia Pac Fam Med 10, 4 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1447-056X-10-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Patient-centered care
  • Comprehensive care
  • Continuous care
  • Discourse analysis